Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · California

Richard Lopez Construction Inc.

Corona, CA · ~86 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Richard Lopez Construction Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. safety composite

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Richard Lopez Construction Inc.: 0.0 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Richard Lopez Construction Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Corona, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/147
  • PHOTO Hammers Utility Corp
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammers Utility Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richard Lopez Construction Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=5.7 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Richard Lopez Construction Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 147 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in California.

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. (86 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Richard Lopez Construction Inc.
Richard Lopez Construction Inc. (86 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Richard Lopez Construction Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 1 0
2019 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Corona

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammers Utility Corp 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR T-Ray Construction Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DTE Electric Company - Belle River 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valiant Power South 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MALAGA HARVEST SHOP 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Muller Ranch, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE OXNARD TERRACE 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Farms 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Mason City Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cram Roofing Company, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bosse Construction 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shafii's Inc. dba TigerPress 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Steiner eOptics, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vishay Dale Electronics UltraSource 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centra Information Technology 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westminster Pet 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.