Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction · Michigan

DTE Electric Company - Belle River

East China Twp, MI · ~48 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DTE Electric Company - Belle River runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction workplace, earning a grade B.

DTE Electric Company - Belle River: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DTE Electric Company - Belle River safety composite

DTE Electric Company - Belle River scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

DTE Electric Company - Belle River injury rate improved

DTE Electric Company - Belle River's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · East China Twp, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #39/54
  • PHOTO Hammers Utility Corp
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammers Utility Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

DTE Electric Company - Belle River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DTE Electric Company - Belle River averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DTE Electric Company - Belle River TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where DTE Electric Company - Belle River falls in its industry

1,605 Power and Communication Line a establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 54 Power and Communication Line a employers in Michigan.

DTE Electric Company - Belle River (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DTE Electric Company - Belle River
DTE Electric Company - Belle River (48 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

DTE Electric Company - Belle River has fewer employees than the Power and Communication Line and Related median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · East China Twp

1,605 Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammers Utility Corp 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR T-Ray Construction Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richard Lopez Construction Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valiant Power South 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sietsema Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.M. Longyear, LLC - Office & Forestry 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Top Grade Aggregates, LLC 48 FTE
NAT-TCR S04241 - Blue Ridge / Salem Hauling 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waters of White Hall 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DI - T44/34/6 CLS NAS Whiting Field 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000051 Quickchek Food Stores 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Le Sueur Agronomy 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detwiler's Home Office & Distribution Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 042 - San Antonio, TX 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Care Suffolk 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.