Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Minnesota

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska

Chaska, MN · ~301 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska: 5.0 TCR = 67% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska safety composite

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska: 4.6 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska's TCR rose 0.8 from 4.6 in 2023 to 5.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Chaska, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #107/249
  • PHOTO Holy Redeemer Hospital
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~301 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holy Redeemer Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska averages 5.0 TCR (67% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska TCR series: 2023=4.6 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 7.5

Where Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 249 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Minnesota.

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska (301 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska
Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska (301 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Ridgeview Two Twelve Medical Center Chaska has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 1.8 15 0 0
2023 4.6 1.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Chaska

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 87 employers in Chaska, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holy Redeemer Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franciscan Health Dyer 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GROVE CITY HOSPITAL 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry County Health Center 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sherco Generating Plant 301 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1609 301 FTE
STATE-SIZE Discovery Center 301 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brooklyn Park Campus 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Medical 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 596 FTE
NAT-TCR St Joseph Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. John Rehabilitation Hospital, an affiliate of Encompass Health 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clean Uniforms and More 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR School Specialty - Lombard 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton, Fort Lauderdale 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camrl - Mira Loma Operations 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fltal - Tallahassee Center 301 FTE
NAT-SIZE Helping Hands Homecare LTD 301 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.