Biomass electric power generation · California

Rio Bravo Rocklin

Lincoln, CA · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rio Bravo Rocklin runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biomass electric power generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Rio Bravo Rocklin: 2.6 TCR = 219% of Biomass electric power generation BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rio Bravo Rocklin safety composite

Rio Bravo Rocklin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

Rio Bravo Rocklin injury rate improved

Rio Bravo Rocklin's TCR fell 0.7 from 4.1 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221117 · Lincoln, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 219% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #5/12
  • PHOTO Genesee Power Station
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesee Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rio Bravo Rocklin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rio Bravo Rocklin averages 2.6 TCR (219% of the Biomass electric power generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rio Bravo Rocklin TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Rio Bravo Rocklin falls in its industry

54 Biomass electric power generat establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 12 Biomass electric power generat employers in California.

Rio Bravo Rocklin (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rio Bravo Rocklin
Rio Bravo Rocklin (34 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Rio Bravo Rocklin has more employees than the Biomass electric power generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2021 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221117 · CA · Lincoln

54 Biomass electric power generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 43 employers in Lincoln, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesee Power Station 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDL- Johnston 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novo Power 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thunder Valley Casino Resort 2,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Placer Unified School District 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBR Inc, dba SFBGC, dba RFC 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Ricoh Electronics. Inc. Toner 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kwik Trip Bread and Bun Bakery 979 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Team Industries, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GR-Oliver Healthcare Packaging 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bahama House 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aledo Seed 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridge 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Appliance GWV 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.