Biomass electric power generation · California

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc.

Anderson, CA · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biomass electric power generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 217% of Biomass electric power generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. safety composite

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2019

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. injury rate improved

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221117 · Anderson, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 217% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO Novo Power
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Novo Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (217% of the Biomass electric power generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. falls in its industry

54 Biomass electric power generat establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Biomass electric power generat employers in California.

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. (40 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc.
Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. (40 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc. has more employees than the Biomass electric power generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.1 2.0 3 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221117 · CA · Anderson

54 Biomass electric power generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Anderson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Novo Power 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rio Bravo Rocklin 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesee Power Station 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDL- Johnston 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR LinkUs Enterprises, LLC 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5133 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5133 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries 302 FTE
NAT-TCR MEPPI2865 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fanatics- Bulls Bay 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR IL - Innophos 700 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal IG - Spring Green IG 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida MicroElectronics Hill Ave 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Materion - Albuquerque North 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE GraphTec 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE PBi 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.