Fossil Fuel Electric Generation · Minnesota
Riverside 2700
Minneapolis, MN · ~224 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.2
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Riverside 2700 runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Generation workplace, earning a grade A.
Riverside 2700: 0.2 TCR = 19% of Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Riverside 2700 safety composite
Riverside 2700 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
65/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- A 0.23 per 100 workers
Safer than 97% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.49 per 100 workers
Safer than 38% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Riverside 2700 held a steady TCR band
Riverside 2700's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.4 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=0.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221112 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 19% of ind
- DART 0.5 DART
- RANK #3/24
- PHOTO North Carolina Elect…
- BOOK 4y book
- INJ 1 inj
- SIZE ~224 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: North Carolina Electric Cooperatives (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
Riverside 2700 in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site 0.2
Riverside 2700
0.2 TCR
- North Carolina 0.2
North Carolina Electric Cooperatives
0.2 TCR
- Asheville Skyl 0.2
Asheville Skyland Fossil and CT Plants
0.2 TCR
- TS Power Plant 0.2
TS Power Plant
0.2 TCR
- Constellation 0.2
Constellation Power Corporate
0.2 TCR
What this shows Riverside 2700 averages 0.2 TCR (19% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS benchmark).
Riverside 2700 TCR series: 2017=0.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.5 · BLS 1.2
Where Riverside 2700 falls in its industry
846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio establishmentsSafer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 24 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio employers in Minnesota.
Riverside 2700 has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221112 · MN · Minneapolis
846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.