Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · North Carolina

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives

Raleigh, NC · ~156 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives: 0.2 TCR = 19% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives safety composite

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2018

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives injury rate improved

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/20
  • PHOTO Riverside 2700
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverside 2700 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Carolina Electric Cooperatives averages 0.2 TCR (19% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 1.2

Where North Carolina Electric Cooperatives falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Electric power generation, fos employers in North Carolina.

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives (156 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North Carolina Electric Cooperatives
North Carolina Electric Cooperatives (156 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

North Carolina Electric Cooperatives has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Raleigh

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverside 2700 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asheville Skyland Fossil and CT Plants 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TS Power Plant 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Constellation Power Corporate 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE R.W. S. Construction, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE I40/440 - Project 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schindler Clinton Escalator Plant 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mooresville 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR NBC Combined Finance Service Center Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Galliano Marine Service LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Dow Chemical Company -Newark, DE 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : South Hatfield, MA (GDC) 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Matagorda LDPE 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intech 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connector Manufacturing - Hamilton 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legrand North America West Hartford 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.