Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing

Castleton, NY · ~70 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing: 14.2 TCR = 218% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing safety composite

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2022→2023

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing injury rate improved

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing's TCR fell 2.4 from 15.4 in 2022 to 13.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=15.4 · 2023=13.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Castleton, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #532/616
  • PHOTO Hospice of East Texas
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hospice of East Texas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing averages 14.2 TCR (218% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing TCR series: 2022=15.4 · 2023=13 · BLS 6.5

Where Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #532 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing (70 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing
Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing (70 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Riverside Center Rehabilitation & Nursing has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.0 6.5 6 2 0
2022 15.4 9.6 3 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Castleton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 12 employers in Castleton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hospice of East Texas 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb City Health and Rehabilitation Center 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radford Health & Rehab Center 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Clemente Villas by the Sea 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samascott Orchards LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westchester 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Sol Contracting/El Sol Ltd. Ent. JV 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callahan Paving Corp. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeBrino Caulking Associates Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Center for Rehabilitlation and Nursing 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM. J. Keller & Sons Construction Corp. 86 FTE
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Boise 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Magic City Enterprises, Inc. 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Conservatory at Alden Bridge 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02702 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Construction 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA006 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homeland 219 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newman Carriers, Inc 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.