Medical care management services · Mississippi

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Greenwood, MS · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Medical care management services workplace, earning a grade D.

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 5.3 TCR = 140% of Medical care management services BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center held a steady TCR band

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.0 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Greenwood, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 140% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO 1006-CHS Medical Edu…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1006-CHS Medical Education (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 5.3 TCR (140% of the Medical care management services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=0 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

461 Medical care management servic establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Medical care management servic employers in Mississippi.

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (91 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (91 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Medical care management services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 24.4 23.6 0 31 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.0 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · MS · Greenwood

461 Medical care management services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 59 employers in Greenwood, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1006-CHS Medical Education 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155 COMMUNITY DRIVE 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR *Einstein Plaza Mayfair 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5049 - GA Newton County Jail 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Production 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Harvesters, Moss Point, MS Facility 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Metal Works Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chickasaw Container Corporation 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenwood Accessories 682 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenwood 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR 716 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 716 280 FTE
NAT-TCR Spiniello Infrastructure West 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Caretti Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McClure Properties LTD 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 298 Tomball 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dixon Valve and Coupling Co. BOSS Division 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cutting Edge Machine and Tool 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Flexibles Yuba City 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Painting Company, Inc 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.