Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified · North Carolina

1006-CHS Medical Education

Charlotte, NC · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

1006-CHS Medical Education runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified workplace, earning a grade D.

1006-CHS Medical Education: 5.3 TCR = 140% of Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

1006-CHS Medical Education safety composite

1006-CHS Medical Education scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

1006-CHS Medical Education held a steady TCR band

1006-CHS Medical Education's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.4 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Riverview Nursing an…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

1006-CHS Medical Education in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 1006-CHS Medical Education averages 5.3 TCR (140% of the Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

1006-CHS Medical Education TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=8 · 2020=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where 1006-CHS Medical Education falls in its industry

461 Health and Allied Services, No establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Health and Allied Services, No employers in North Carolina.

1006-CHS Medical Education (54 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 1006-CHS Medical Education
1006-CHS Medical Education (54 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

1006-CHS Medical Education has fewer employees than the Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewher median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2018 5.8 0.0 3 0 0
2017 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 4.4 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · NC · Charlotte

461 Health and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155 COMMUNITY DRIVE 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR *Einstein Plaza Mayfair 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5049 - GA Newton County Jail 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ER LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elizabethtown 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Raleigh North 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31045 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Clemson, Biotest Plasma Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Portsmouth Abbey School 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2116 - White Plains 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Youngstown, Inc. (Warren Campus) 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia 147 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fenton Power Systems-08 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar Michigan - 1015 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vanewp-Opi-Newport News 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.