Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees · Texas

Robertson Unit Clinic

Abilene, TX · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Robertson Unit Clinic runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees workplace, earning a grade F.

Robertson Unit Clinic: 7.8 TCR = 207% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Robertson Unit Clinic safety composite

Robertson Unit Clinic scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2023

Robertson Unit Clinic injury rate improved

Robertson Unit Clinic's TCR fell 5.0 from 7.4 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=12.6 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Abilene, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/21
  • PHOTO Henry Ford Sterling …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henry Ford Sterling Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Robertson Unit Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Robertson Unit Clinic averages 7.8 TCR (207% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Robertson Unit Clinic TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=12.6 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=19.1 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Robertson Unit Clinic falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 21 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Texas.

Robertson Unit Clinic (61 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Robertson Unit Clinic
Robertson Unit Clinic (61 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Robertson Unit Clinic has fewer employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 8.4 4.2 4 0 0
2020 19.1 19.1 9 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 8.1 2.0 4 0 0
2017 12.6 7.6 5 0 0
2016 7.4 4.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · TX · Abilene

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 238 employers in Abilene, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henry Ford Sterling Heights 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Ford Neuromuscular Specialty Center 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington Road Medical Center 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Iowa Therapy PC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Muleshoe Dairy LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Drilling LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXOMA SVC CTR 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEC-Cedar Park 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendrick Medical Center South 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene CCD 573 FTE
NAT-TCR Maurer's Textile Rental Services 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hribar Transport 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR NAPA Auto Parts-Distribution Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckhead 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercedes-Benz of Beaverton 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premise One 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carilion Clinic Linen Services Co. 23 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village Plaza Sparkle 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.