Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions · Indiana

Rochester Manufacturing Facility

Rochester, IN · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rochester Manufacturing Facility runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions workplace, earning a grade F.

Rochester Manufacturing Facility: 13.9 TCR = 258% of Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rochester Manufacturing Facility safety composite

Rochester Manufacturing Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2018

Rochester Manufacturing Facility injury rate improved

Rochester Manufacturing Facility's TCR fell 2.7 from 15.5 in 2016 to 12.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.5 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=12.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Rochester, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 258% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #41/41
  • PHOTO Global Gear & Machin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Global Gear & Machining (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Rochester Manufacturing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rochester Manufacturing Facility averages 13.9 TCR (258% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rochester Manufacturing Facility TCR series: 2016=15.5 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=12.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Rochester Manufacturing Facility falls in its industry

320 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 41 Assembly line rebuilding of au employers in Indiana.

Rochester Manufacturing Facility (41 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rochester Manufacturing Facility
Rochester Manufacturing Facility (41 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Rochester Manufacturing Facility has fewer employees than the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 12.8 7.3 7 0 0
2017 13.5 10.8 5 0 0
2016 15.5 7.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IN · Rochester

320 Assembly line rebuilding of automotive, truck, and bus transmissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 34 employers in Rochester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Global Gear & Machining 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTPORT MANUFACTURING (ALLENTOWN, PA) 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Truck Parts Company 36 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Light Vehicle Transmissions Knoxville 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bos Dairy, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN15-SEL-TERRE HAUTE ADMIN' 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herrema Dairy LLC 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodlawn Hospital 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Metal Products 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Community School Corp 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lau- Rochester 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Peapod S&S North Smithfield, Ri 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugarbush Resort 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mifflin Center 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Timbers Skilled Nursing and Therapy 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Magnum Systems Parsons 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosewood Specialty Care 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interim HealthCare - Salem Office 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine Office 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.