Fire and EMS Services · Illinois

Rockton Fire Protection District

Rockton, IL · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rockton Fire Protection District runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire and EMS Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Rockton Fire Protection District: 8.4 TCR = 261% of Fire and EMS Services BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rockton Fire Protection District safety composite

Rockton Fire Protection District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rockton Fire Protection District held a steady TCR band

Rockton Fire Protection District's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 29.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=29.5 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Rockton, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 261% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #109/262
  • PHOTO Fire Department
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Rockton Fire Protection District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rockton Fire Protection District averages 8.4 TCR (261% of the Fire and EMS Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rockton Fire Protection District TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=29.5 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Rockton Fire Protection District falls in its industry

793 Fire and EMS Services establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 262 Fire and EMS Services employers in Illinois.

Rockton Fire Protection District (42 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Rockton Fire Protection District
Rockton Fire Protection District (42 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Rockton Fire Protection District has fewer employees than the Fire and EMS Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 11.3 11.3 1 0 0
2019 29.5 9.8 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Rockton

793 Fire and EMS Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 12 employers in Rockton, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Department 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox River & Countryside Fire Rescue District 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worden Fire Protection District 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 97390003-510000 FIRE EMERG MED SVCS 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DAS Pontiac, IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waterman, IL-R&D 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield IL 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egyptian Electric Cooperative 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taylor Company 650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taylor a Division of Carrier Commercial Refrigeration 623 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taylor Commercial Foodservice, Inc. 539 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockton 308 FTE
NAT-TCR BNACS - Hilton Garden Inn - Cool Springs 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Charles Barnum School 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Bremerton 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corralitos Nursery 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 133 Falmouth Road, Mashpee, MA 02649 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ward-Henshaw Construction 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE AITX Goodrich, Texas 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.