Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Texas

Rockwell American - Plant 45

Seagoville, TX · ~93 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rockwell American - Plant 45 runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Rockwell American - Plant 45: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rockwell American - Plant 45 safety composite

Rockwell American - Plant 45 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2021

Rockwell American - Plant 45 injury rate improved

Rockwell American - Plant 45's TCR fell 5.8 from 9.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Seagoville, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Twist Plants 3, 4, 6…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twist Plants 3, 4, 6 and 8 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Rockwell American - Plant 45 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rockwell American - Plant 45 averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rockwell American - Plant 45 TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Rockwell American - Plant 45 falls in its industry

189 Leaf springs, heavy gauge meta establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Leaf springs, heavy gauge meta employers in Texas.

Rockwell American - Plant 45 (93 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rockwell American - Plant 45
Rockwell American - Plant 45 (93 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Rockwell American - Plant 45 has more employees than the Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.9 2.9 4 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2016 9.7 8.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · TX · Seagoville

189 Leaf springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 19 employers in Seagoville, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twist Plants 3, 4, 6 and 8 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arnott Industries 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rowley Spring & Stamping Corporation 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spiros Industries, Inc. 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Apache Corporation - Houston Region 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strata Material, LLC. Dba Acrosa Crushed Concrete 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Branch Service Center CPC4 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE HARLINGEN TX OF 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC7 509 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5288 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5288 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barber Specialties Inc. 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Benchmark-Dayton 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cell-Crete Corporation 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Peachtree Village Holiday Island 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmon House Care Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metro Grounds Management, LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Putty Products Company 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Ind. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Responder Emergency Medical Services Inc 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.