Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental · Ohio

Benchmark-Dayton

Dayton, OH · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-Dayton runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental workplace, earning a grade C.

Benchmark-Dayton: 4.2 TCR = 112% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-Dayton safety composite

Benchmark-Dayton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.0

2016→2021

Benchmark-Dayton injury rate improved

Benchmark-Dayton's TCR fell 15.0 from 15.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.0 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/40
  • PHOTO Staffing - Chattanooga
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Staffing - Chattanooga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-Dayton averages 4.2 TCR (112% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-Dayton TCR series: 2016=15 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-Dayton falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 40 Companion services for disable employers in Ohio.

Benchmark-Dayton (38 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-Dayton
Benchmark-Dayton (38 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-Dayton has fewer employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 15.0 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · OH · Dayton

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Staffing - Chattanooga 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Inc Schuylkill County PA 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TheKey - CT, Glastonbury (100 Western Blvd.) 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goforth Services Inc 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Peachtree Village Holiday Island 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harmon House Care Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 26K2 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell American - Plant 45 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - Chesterfield 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepsi-Cola Roxboro 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Sprinkler Company, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jorban-Riscoe Associates, Inc. - Lenexa 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.