Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Pennsylvania

Harmon House Care Center

Mt. Pleasant, PA · ~148 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harmon House Care Center runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Harmon House Care Center: 4.2 TCR = 65% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harmon House Care Center safety composite

Harmon House Care Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2021

Harmon House Care Center injury rate improved

Harmon House Care Center's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mt. Pleasant, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 65% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #127/754
  • PHOTO Royal Oaks Nursing a…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Harmon House Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harmon House Care Center averages 4.2 TCR (65% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harmon House Care Center TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2 · BLS 6.5

Where Harmon House Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 754 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Pennsylvania.

Harmon House Care Center (148 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Harmon House Care Center
Harmon House Care Center (148 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Harmon House Care Center has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 9.1 5.3 12 0 0
2016 8.7 7.9 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Mt. Pleasant

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in Mt. Pleasant, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hildebrand Care Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rehab Center of Bakersfield 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westmoreland at CareCore 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raccoon Service Center 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1100 State Street 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA PA Allentown 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fazio Mechanical Services - Pennsylvania 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Community Services 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Pittsburgh - 0562 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 623 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reinhart - Pittsburgh - 0562 321 FTE
NAT-TCR 26K2 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Peachtree Village Holiday Island 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Benchmark-Dayton 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell American - Plant 45 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Patterson Logistics Services 9 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE US158: Raleigh 250 - SG 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hemohc-015-Hemphill Home Care 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cell-Crete Corporation 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.