Primary elements for process flow measurement (i.e., orifice plates) manufacturing · California

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~58 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Primary elements for process flow measurement (i.e., orifice plates) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Primary elements for process flow measurement (i.e., orifice plates) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc safety composite

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2020→2023

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc injury rate improved

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/27
  • PHOTO Houston Equity Drive
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Equity Drive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Primary elements for process flow measurement (i.e., orifice plates) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc TCR series: 2020=1.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc falls in its industry

322 Primary elements for process f establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 27 Primary elements for process f employers in California.

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc
Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Rohrback Cosasco Systems, Inc has fewer employees than the Primary elements for process flow measur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

322 Primary elements for process flow measurement (i.e., orifice plates) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Equity Drive 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Control Instruments Corp 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monitor Technologies LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Solutions Center Houston 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Pattillo Construction Corp 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rexco Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CORE Construction, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sonju Two Harbors, LLC. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet Processing 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE TDH Landscaping LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elements Group Austin, LLC 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.