Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · Minnesota

Roseville, MN (All State)

Roseville, MN · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville, MN (All State) runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade C.

Roseville, MN (All State): 2.9 TCR = 103% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville, MN (All State) safety composite

Roseville, MN (All State) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roseville, MN (All State): 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Roseville, MN (All State)'s TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2023 to 5.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/100
  • PHOTO Tice Electric Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tice Electric Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Roseville, MN (All State) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville, MN (All State) averages 2.9 TCR (103% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville, MN (All State) TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Roseville, MN (All State) falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 100 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in Minnesota.

Roseville, MN (All State) (21 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville, MN (All State)
Roseville, MN (All State) (21 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Roseville, MN (All State) has fewer employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MN · Roseville

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tice Electric Company 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Electrical Services, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stellar Building Technologies 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Electrical Construction, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Morningside 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanson Sign & Screen Process Corp. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Lumber 390 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LG Energy Solutions - Holland 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Transportation 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Chrysler 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Mechanical Contrators LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-6958 W 60TH ST 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.