Construction management, multifamily building · New York

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc.

Congers, NY · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, multifamily building workplace, earning a grade C.

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Construction management, multifamily building BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. safety composite

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. held a steady TCR band

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Congers, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/42
  • PHOTO Turtle Bay Resort Re…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Turtle Bay Resort Renovation (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Construction management, multifamily building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. falls in its industry

410 Construction management, multi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 42 Construction management, multi employers in New York.

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate R&S Construction Contracting, Inc.
R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, multifamily bui median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · NY · Congers

410 Construction management, multifamily building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 11 employers in Congers, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Turtle Bay Resort Renovation 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CFE Management, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal Construction - Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triton Construction Company, LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singer Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheland Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKnight's River Breeze Farm, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECD NY INC 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aptar 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Mini Distinctive Landscapes LTD 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR Star Kay White, Inc. 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Armstrong Crane and Rigging Corp. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ridge Apartments 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neabsco Maintenance Facility 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wellington Operations Center 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.