Electric power distribution systems · Illinois

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative

Auburn, IL · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative runs at 397% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative: 4.8 TCR = 397% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative safety composite

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative: 0.0 → 14.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative's TCR rose 14.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 14.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Auburn, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 397% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #84/97
  • PHOTO Dixie Electric Power…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dixie Electric Power Association, Laurel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative averages 4.8 TCR (397% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=14.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 97 Electric power distribution sy employers in Illinois.

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative (80 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative
Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative (80 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.5 0.0 1 2 0
2023 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IL · Auburn

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 8 employers in Auburn, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dixie Electric Power Association, Laurel 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portsmouth Service Center 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turlock Irrigation District 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 036 - Underground 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crestwood Reporting Center 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern - IL Gas Ops 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE 74G - Eastern - IL Gas Ops 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Water Reclamation Plant 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Auburn CUSD #10 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR DICKEY-john Corporation 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Plastics, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitman Houses 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix G10 Aviation 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR WCS - Bronx Zoo of New York 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethpage Camp Resort 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beaver Lake Education Center 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5425 - Fort Worth 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Central EMS 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.