Employer · Tennessee

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities

Kingsport, TN · ~48 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities: 4.4 TCR = 170% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities safety composite

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities injury rate improved

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities's TCR fell 6.4 from 10.3 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Kingsport, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 170% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #24/43
  • PHOTO Mammoth Disposal Com…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mammoth Disposal Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities averages 4.4 TCR (170% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities TCR series: 2016=10.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 2.6

Where S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 43 industry employers in Tennessee.

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities (48 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities
S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities (48 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2021 7.4 5.5 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 10.4 0.0 1 3 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.3 10.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · TN · Kingsport

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 152 employers in Kingsport, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mammoth Disposal Company 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yes 2 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWS - Oklahoma City 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S06698 - Winton Disposal 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bolivar Energy Authority 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Department 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jefferson Cocke County Utility District 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chattanooga Service Center 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Kingsport Site 7,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holston Valley Medical Center 1,733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company Kinsport TN- BSL 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - VA 1,073 FTE
NAT-TCR S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Nampa Healthcare Inc dba: Meadow View Nursing & Rehabilitation 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dl Farm Management, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesapeake 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tidelands Georgetown Es 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05079 - WM - Kingston 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station 1 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE MLC-TC-360 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.