Employer · Pennsylvania

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill

Pen Argyl, PA · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill: 4.4 TCR = 170% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill safety composite

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill held a steady TCR band

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Pen Argyl, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 170% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #12/18
  • PHOTO El Coqui Landfill - …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Coqui Landfill - Humacao Landfill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill averages 4.4 TCR (170% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3 · BLS 2.6

Where S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill falls in its industry

288 industry establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 18 industry employers in Pennsylvania.

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill (31 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill
S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill (31 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

S03012 - Grand Central Sanitary Landfill has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 7.9 5.3 3 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2018 6.3 0.0 0 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · PA · Pen Argyl

288 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Pen Argyl, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Coqui Landfill - Humacao Landfill 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apache Junction Landfill Corp. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S02920 - Arden Landfill 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buncombe County-Public Works 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03011 - Grand Central Sanitation 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 164 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pen Argyl Plant 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pen Argyl 009 61 FTE
NAT-TCR S04195 - WM of The Tri-Cities 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Nampa Healthcare Inc dba: Meadow View Nursing & Rehabilitation 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dl Farm Management, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesapeake 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE S05886 - Waters Hauling 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heath Stairworks, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03936 - Brunswick Hauling 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams NationaLease 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.