Employer · California

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC)

Oakland, CA · ~387 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) runs at 355% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC): 9.2 TCR = 355% of industry BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) safety composite

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC): 7.1 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 26.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2023

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC)'s TCR rose 1.6 from 7.1 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 26.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 355% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #163/247
  • PHOTO Dallas Waste Disposa…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 204 inj
  • SIZE ~387 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dallas Waste Disposal & Recycling Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) averages 9.2 TCR (355% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=26.5 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=9 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=8.7 · BLS 2.6

Where S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 247 industry employers in California.

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) (387 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC)
S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) (387 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.7 7.6 31 0 0
2022 4.8 4.5 17 0 0
2021 6.6 4.7 24 0 0
2020 9.0 8.2 33 0 0
2019 6.8 5.1 28 0 0
2018 26.5 0.0 23 89 0
2017 4.2 3.7 18 0 0
2016 7.1 6.6 30 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Oakland

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dallas Waste Disposal & Recycling Inc 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanitary Service Company 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanitation - operations 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PROMED WASTE SOLUTIONS, LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eagle Labor Contracting, Inc 387 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Valley Harvest, Inc. 387 FTE
STATE-SIZE Century Park East - 01 387 FTE
STATE-SIZE F.E. Weymouth Filtration Plant 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Piala's Nursery & Garden Shop, Inc 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AIG Florida 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FPS Alsip 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Traverse Container-GR 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kualoa Ranch Hawaii, Inc. 387 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kivi Bros Trucking 387 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oncology-Hematology Associates 387 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert LLC - 062 387 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.