Fish and wildlife conservation program administration · Minnesota

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office

Detroit Lakes, MN · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fish and wildlife conservation program administration workplace, earning a grade B.

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office: 2.3 TCR = 72% of Fish and wildlife conservation program administration BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office safety composite

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office held a steady TCR band

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Detroit Lakes, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/45
  • PHOTO Dept. of Fish & Game…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dept. of Fish & Game (35) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office averages 2.3 TCR (72% of the Fish and wildlife conservation program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office falls in its industry

413 Fish and wildlife conservation establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 45 Fish and wildlife conservation employers in Minnesota.

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office
EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

EI013 - Detroit Lakes Office has fewer employees than the Fish and wildlife conservation program a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.9 4.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · Detroit Lakes

413 Fish and wildlife conservation program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Detroit Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (35) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (15) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington State Dept of Natural Resources - Northwest Region 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks and Recreation Department 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital Detroit Lakes 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Marys Hospital - Detroit Lakes 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operations - Detroit Lakes, MN 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR BTD Manufacturing Detroit Lakes 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Prime Retail Services, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tappahannock VA Yard 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Sales MC - New Albany 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sacramento 2 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Firestone 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Clara Methodist Retirement Foundation, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torq Corporation 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.