Sawmills · Indiana

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods

Terre Haute, IN · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sawmills workplace, earning a grade B.

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Sawmills BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods safety composite

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods held a steady TCR band

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Terre Haute, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO Gutchess Lumber Comp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gutchess Lumber Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Sawmills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods falls in its industry

905 Sawmills establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Sawmills employers in Indiana.

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods (39 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods
Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods (39 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Terre Haute Hardwoods, LLC, dba/ Kirkham Hardwoods has fewer employees than the Sawmills median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · IN · Terre Haute

905 Sawmills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 194 employers in Terre Haute, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gutchess Lumber Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL170 Palatka Chipmill 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Fraser Inc - Armour Lumber Mill 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shearouse Lumber Company 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terre Haute Regional Hospital 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Union Hospital Terre Haute 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vigo County Government 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Terre Haute 661 FTE
NAT-TCR Sacramento 2 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Celadon Systems 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Placing Los Angeles 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waseca 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas North 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walter R Earle Corporation 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station 5: Lake 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.