Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · California

Sacramento

West Sacramento, CA · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sacramento runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade C.

Sacramento: 4.8 TCR = 108% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sacramento safety composite

Sacramento scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2024

Sacramento injury rate improved

Sacramento's TCR fell 6.7 from 9.9 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=9.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · West Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 108% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #66/110
  • PHOTO Alnye Utica, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alnye Utica, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sacramento in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sacramento averages 4.8 TCR (108% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sacramento TCR series: 2017=9.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=9 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Sacramento falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 110 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in California.

Sacramento (52 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sacramento
Sacramento (52 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Sacramento has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 3 0 0
2022 9.0 6.4 7 0 0
2021 7.3 5.2 7 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.9 9.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · CA · West Sacramento

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 188 employers in West Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alnye Utica, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Blue Trucking Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otto Trucking, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lester R. Summers, Inc. 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of General Services 3,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
NAT-TCR Manko Window Systems, Inc. - Des Moines 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Village of Hendersonville 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Protection, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Altercare of Alliance Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorcon Indianapolis 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bard Brachytherapy 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stephens Landscaping 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capitol Hill Nursing Center, LLC dba Capitol Hill Skilled Nursing and Therapy 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.