Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Georgia

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville

Name: Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Cartersville, GA · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 5.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville safety composite

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville: 4.7 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville's TCR rose 1.8 from 4.7 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Cartersville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #77/103
PHOTO 4064_7815
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4064_7815 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

This site

5.6
4064_7815

5.6
PSI Urethanes,

5.6
7682_18534

5.6
Pettibone : Da

5.6

What this shows Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 103 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Georgia.

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville (52 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Samuel Packaging Systems Group Cartersville has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	6.5	0.0	2	0	0
2016	4.7	4.7	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · GA · Cartersville

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cartersville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	4064_7815	MARCELLUS, MI	5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PSI Urethanes, Inc.	AUSTIN, TX	5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	7682_18534	SHEBOYGAN, WI	5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pettibone : Davies	CAROL STREAM, IL	5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Cleveland Hatchery (CV)	CLEVELAND	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Transmission Support PC Field Services Maintenance Reliability 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park	ATLANTA	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Statesboro Operating - 111 Stockyard Rd.	ATLANTA	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia - Atlanta East - Atlanta Realty	CONYERS	52 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Plant 15/1G	Cartersville	1,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Plant 15	Cartersville	1,294 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Piedmont Cartersville Medical Center	Cartersville	643 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cartersville Brewery	Cartersville	527 FTE
NAT-TCR	Industrial Solutions : IS - SC - Philadelphia, PA, USA	Philadelphia, PA	5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Winston Salem Building (Ncwin)	Winston Salem, NC	5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Eversource - New Bedford Gas	New Bedford, MA	5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus/Mount Carmel	Columbus, OH	5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Rocky Mountain Stonework, Inc.	Estes Park, CO	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Hartville LLC	Hartville, MO	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Sikeston at Clearview Inc	Sikeston, MO	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Buckhead Meat of North Carolina	Charlotte, NC	52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.