Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · California

San Francisco Healing Center

San Francisco, CA · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Francisco Healing Center runs at 265% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

San Francisco Healing Center: 10.1 TCR = 265% of Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Francisco Healing Center safety composite

San Francisco Healing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2022→2023

San Francisco Healing Center injury rate improved

San Francisco Healing Center's TCR fell 6.8 from 13.5 in 2022 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.5 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621330 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 265% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #34/38
  • PHOTO JoyBridge Kids Smyrna
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JoyBridge Kids Smyrna (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Francisco Healing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Francisco Healing Center averages 10.1 TCR (265% of the Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Francisco Healing Center TCR series: 2022=13.5 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where San Francisco Healing Center falls in its industry

137 Social workers' , mental healt establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 38 Social workers' , mental healt employers in California.

San Francisco Healing Center (51 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate San Francisco Healing Center
San Francisco Healing Center (51 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

San Francisco Healing Center has fewer employees than the Social workers' , mental health, offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2022 13.5 13.5 1 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621330 · CA · San Francisco

137 Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JoyBridge Kids Smyrna 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JoyBridge Kids Murfreesboro 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BII PA Philadelphia 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JoyBridge Kids Brentwood 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Studdard Moving & Storage 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Autoforce Kansas City 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Citibus 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HVAC Services INC 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE R. H. Sheppard Co., Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Healthcare 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE I C Reed and Sons Inc 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.