Poultry Processing · Mississippi

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing

Hazlehurst, MS · ~603 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Poultry Processing workplace, earning a grade D.

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing: 4.2 TCR = 127% of Poultry Processing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing safety composite

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing injury rate improved

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing's TCR fell 3.5 from 7.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Hazlehurst, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #29/41
  • PHOTO West Liberty Foods
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 112 inj
  • SIZE ~603 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Liberty Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing averages 4.2 TCR (127% of the Poultry Processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry Processing establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 41 Poultry Processing employers in Mississippi.

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing (603 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing
Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing (603 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing has fewer employees than the Poultry Processing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.2 15 5 0
2023 4.3 3.6 17 6 0
2022 2.2 1.6 8 4 0
2021 3.5 3.4 10 9 0
2020 3.9 3.5 13 9 0
2019 4.0 3.6 9 12 0
2018 5.5 4.4 14 13 0
2017 3.8 2.8 11 9 0
2016 7.0 6.6 15 19 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · MS · Hazlehurst

509 Poultry Processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 16 employers in Hazlehurst, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Liberty Foods 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DG Foods, LLC Hazlehurst 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diestel Turkey Ranch 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkansas Plant 1 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Laurel Processing 602 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casino and Hotel 600 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neel-Schaffer, Inc. 611 FTE
STATE-SIZE S3 Stennis Space Center (SSC) Operations 595 FTE
CITY-NEAR DG Foods Hazelhurst 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR DG Foods 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 954 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR 954 215 FTE
NAT-TCR Kingsport Martin Transport 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Alfond Inn at Rollins 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Meadow 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TEI Rock Drills 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE PayneCrest Electric 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE UPMC Benefit Management Services 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulfspan Industrial, LLC 603 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.