Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · California

Squab Producers of California

Modesto, CA · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Squab Producers of California runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Squab Producers of California: 7.5 TCR = 228% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Squab Producers of California safety composite

Squab Producers of California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.5

2017→2024

Squab Producers of California injury rate improved

Squab Producers of California's TCR fell 14.5 from 17.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.3 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=5.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Modesto, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 228% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO DEYULIO SAUSAGE COMP…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DEYULIO SAUSAGE COMPANY LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Squab Producers of California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Squab Producers of California averages 7.5 TCR (228% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Squab Producers of California TCR series: 2017=17.3 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=5.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Squab Producers of California falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in California.

Squab Producers of California (36 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Squab Producers of California
Squab Producers of California (36 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Squab Producers of California has fewer employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2021 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2020 9.5 9.5 3 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 8.6 5.7 3 0 0
2017 17.3 3.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · CA · Modesto

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 418 employers in Modesto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DEYULIO SAUSAGE COMPANY LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hope Plant 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corydon Plant 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Processing 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30240) 3,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modesto Operations 3,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-930 3,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR 930 DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO 2,759 FTE
NAT-TCR Schwartz Family Properties 2, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Park & Recreation 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR National Technology 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shea Amesbury 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air Renton, WA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panavision New York 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sperry & Associates, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE AeroDynamics, LLC 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.