Printed circuit laminates manufacturing · California

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4)

San Jose, CA · ~430 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Printed circuit laminates manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4): 1.4 TCR = 44% of Printed circuit laminates manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) safety composite

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2019

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) injury rate improved

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4)'s TCR fell 0.6 from 1.7 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2019=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #19/48
  • PHOTO Moog, Inc - Blacksbu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~430 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moog, Inc - Blacksburg North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Printed circuit laminates manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2019=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) falls in its industry

334 Printed circuit laminates manu establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 48 Printed circuit laminates manu employers in California.

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) (430 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4)
Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) (430 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Sanmina Corporation - First St (Bldg.4) has more employees than the Printed circuit laminates manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.2 0.5 5 0 0
2016 1.7 0.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · CA · San Jose

334 Printed circuit laminates manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moog, Inc - Blacksburg North 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genco Industries, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shoals Technologies Group LLC - Plant 4 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woven Electronics, LLC (Simpsonville SC) 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silent Springs LLC 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE BioLegend Way 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fashion Valley 544 430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Edwards Air Force Base (1466) 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR City Furniture Stuart #17 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 114384-Gulf Atlantic Cs District 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Davidson Centrifugal-USA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Babcock 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Integrity Windows and Doors - Roanoke 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tempe Office 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monticello Nuclear Plant 430 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita (South & North) (Kswic) 430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.