Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater

Swiftwater, PA · ~3,151 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater safety composite

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater held a steady TCR band

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Swiftwater, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO Shire: 500 Shire Way
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 106 inj
  • SIZE ~3,151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shire: 500 Shire Way (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater falls in its industry

234 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, vir establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, vir employers in Pennsylvania.

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater (3,151 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater
Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater (3,151 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater has more employees than the Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.4 17 4 0
2019 0.7 0.5 22 2 0
2018 0.7 0.5 13 8 0
2017 0.9 0.7 24 5 0
2016 0.9 0.8 30 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · PA · Swiftwater

234 Vaccines (i.e., bacterial, virus) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Swiftwater, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shire: 500 Shire Way 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shire: 400 Shire Way 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ultragenyx - Woburn 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zoetis Inc 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE PHILADELPHIA AIR HUB (PAPHA) 3,166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC 3,073 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennsylvania Hospital 3,072 FTE
STATE-SIZE UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (SHY) 3,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Swiftwater Sanofi Pasteur Swiftwater 2,994 FTE
CITY-NEAR First Student Inc - Pocono Mountain 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pocono Mt School Dist 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT SANOFI SWIFTWATER JANITORIAL 58 FTE
NAT-TCR N Amityville NY 1500 New Horizons Blvd 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynamic Industries, Inc. - Scaffolding 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Switch Supernap LAS 7 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Houston Rogerdale 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY1 3,155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaston Memorial Hospital, Incorporated d/b/a CaroMont Regional Medical Center 3,156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Health System - 7240724 3,145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.