Copying machines merchant wholesalers · California

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton)

Pleasanton, CA · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Copying machines merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton): 2.2 TCR = 99% of Copying machines merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) safety composite

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) injury rate improved

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton)'s TCR fell 2.9 from 4.9 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423420 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #34/61
  • PHOTO CA.SOUTH.15 - Ricoh …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA.SOUTH.15 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) averages 2.2 TCR (99% of the Copying machines merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) TCR series: 2018=4.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.2

Where SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) falls in its industry

416 Copying machines merchant whol establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 61 Copying machines merchant whol employers in California.

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) (56 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton)
SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) (56 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.7

SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) has more employees than the Copying machines merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 0 1 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423420 · CA · Pleasanton

416 Copying machines merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA.SOUTH.15 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CO.BOULD.22 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1915-1650X 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1915-1403X 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eunice Service Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Genco Masonry, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wichita Brewing Company East, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richard Manufacturing Company 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammers Construction 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemtrusion-TX, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE H.G. Hill Store #86 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.