Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit · Minnesota

Wilson McShane, Bloomington

Bloomington, MN · ~191 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wilson McShane, Bloomington runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit workplace, earning a grade F.

Wilson McShane, Bloomington: 1.0 TCR = 202% of Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wilson McShane, Bloomington safety composite

Wilson McShane, Bloomington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2022

Wilson McShane, Bloomington injury rate improved

Wilson McShane, Bloomington's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 525120 · Bloomington, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.0 · 202% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P50
  • PHOTO Motion Picture Indus…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wilson McShane, Bloomington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wilson McShane, Bloomington averages 1.0 TCR (202% of the Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Wilson McShane, Bloomington TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Wilson McShane, Bloomington falls in its industry

12 Plans, health and welfare rela establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Wilson McShane, Bloomington (191 employees, TCR 1.0) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Building Service 32BJ Benefit FundsMotion Picture Industry Pension and Health PlansCity of Bridgeport / Health DepartmentSCAN Health PlanCity of Bridgeport Health DepartmentWilson McShane, MissouriWilson McShane, KansasSCAN GroupWilson McShane, Bloomington
Wilson McShane, Bloomington (191 employees, TCR 1.0) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Wilson McShane, Bloomington has more employees than the Plans, health and welfare related employ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 0 2 0
2020 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2017 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

525120 · MN · Bloomington

12 Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Motion Picture Industry Pension and Health Plans 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Health Plan 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Group 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP6 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE XMP 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spectralytics, Inc. 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benedictine Health Center at Innsbruck 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR 2967-IL115 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HG418 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 3799 Family Fare (Papillion, Ne) 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 055376-Newport Beach Po 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bright Future Electric - Sarasota 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 081666-Danbury Po 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-OKTUL03 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.