Veterinary clinics · Illinois

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park

Chicago, IL · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park runs at 2578% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Veterinary clinics workplace, earning a grade F.

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park: 12.9 TCR = 2578% of Veterinary clinics BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park safety composite

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 12.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.6

2023→2024

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park injury rate improved

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park's TCR fell 18.6 from 22.2 in 2023 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=22.2 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541940 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 2578% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Lakefield Veterinary…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakefield Veterinary Group - 180 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park averages 12.9 TCR (2578% of the Veterinary clinics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park TCR series: 2023=22.2 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park falls in its industry

261 Veterinary clinics establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 12.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Veterinary clinics employers in Illinois.

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park (20 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 12.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park
Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park (20 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 12.0

Scout Veterinary Urgent Care- Lincoln Park has fewer employees than the Veterinary clinics median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 12.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 22.2 11.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541940 · IL · Chicago

261 Veterinary clinics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 180 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport Animal Hospial 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 168 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Animal & Bird Hospital of Clearwater Inc. 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE East Ridge 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Creek 4 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deer Run 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand View Farms, LLC. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR 113 West Oaks 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Structures Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Garden Valley Retirement Village 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Forum at Lincoln Heights 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raintree 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Wellington at Conroe 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Cobb Engineering & Tool Co Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE McNichols Scrap Iron Metal Co. 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.