Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · California

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417)

San Jose, CA · ~316 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade D.

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417): 6.1 TCR = 160% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) safety composite

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) held a steady TCR band

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417)'s TCR held near 0.3 from 5.9 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.9 · 2018=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 160% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #18/36
  • PHOTO OI Surgery Beloit
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~316 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OI Surgery Beloit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) averages 6.1 TCR (160% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) TCR series: 2017=5.9 · 2018=6.2 · BLS 3.8

Where SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 36 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in California.

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) (316 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417)
SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) (316 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

SCVHHS, Custody Health Services (417) has more employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.2 1.2 21 0 0
2017 5.9 1.6 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · CA · San Jose

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OI Surgery Beloit 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CarolinaEast Surgery Center 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Shore Health 2 Pond Park 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Surgery Center 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Diego Farms LLC 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Empire Utilites Agency 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE Borrego Solar Systems, Inc. 316 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brady SoCal Inc 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Finance Department 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wixom MI 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Community Provider Network 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Belvedere Commons Tampa 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solaris Healthcare Bayonet Point 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise Holdings 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCY - Stoughton 316 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greatbatch Ltd. 316 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.