Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing made from purchased metal pipe · Texas

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread

Houston, TX · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade B.

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread safety composite

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2019→2024

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread injury rate improved

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/73
  • PHOTO Allegheny Valve & Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allegheny Valve & Coupling, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread TCR series: 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread falls in its industry

337 Wrought iron or steel pipe and establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 73 Wrought iron or steel pipe and employers in Texas.

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread (39 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread
Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread (39 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Seah Steel USA LLC, P1 Thread has fewer employees than the Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · TX · Houston

337 Wrought iron or steel pipe and tubing made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allegheny Valve & Coupling, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASC Engineered Solutions: Greencastle 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA Industries LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deublin Company 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dumas 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy - Wink TX 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAR SOUTH MINING LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Arizona Dry 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aalto Scientific, Ltd. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KenMac Metals - Kansas City 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highlandspring of FT Thomas 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coca Cola Portland Syrup Plant 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaMontagne Builders Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Roofing Systems, LLP 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bay 7, LP DBA The Rambler Motel 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.