Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Seasons at Southpoint

Durham, NC · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seasons at Southpoint runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Seasons at Southpoint: 2.4 TCR = 63% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seasons at Southpoint safety composite

Seasons at Southpoint scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2017→2024

Seasons at Southpoint injury rate improved

Seasons at Southpoint's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/356
  • PHOTO Canoe Brook Ardmore …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Canoe Brook Ardmore LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Seasons at Southpoint in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seasons at Southpoint averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seasons at Southpoint TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Seasons at Southpoint falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Seasons at Southpoint (42 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seasons at Southpoint
Seasons at Southpoint (42 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Seasons at Southpoint has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.6 4.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Durham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Canoe Brook Ardmore LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookfield Operations, LLC dba The Courtyards at Claremore Assisted Living Memory Care 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landings of Gentry Park IL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Lake Wildwood 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR CHC Office Of Physicians 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingery Printing Company Mattoon 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1798 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Image Apparel 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE NTS Tower Road 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenPoint AG-Brinkley 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester, NY-2 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.