Distribution of electric power · Florida

SECO Energy - Ocala

Ocala, FL · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SECO Energy - Ocala runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

SECO Energy - Ocala: 3.1 TCR = 262% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SECO Energy - Ocala safety composite

SECO Energy - Ocala scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

SECO Energy - Ocala injury rate improved

SECO Energy - Ocala's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Ocala, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.1 · 262% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #113/135
  • PHOTO Ozark Service Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ozark Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

SECO Energy - Ocala in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SECO Energy - Ocala averages 3.1 TCR (262% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SECO Energy - Ocala TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where SECO Energy - Ocala falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 135 Distribution of electric power employers in Florida.

SECO Energy - Ocala (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SECO Energy - Ocala
SECO Energy - Ocala (44 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

SECO Energy - Ocala has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 4.7 2.3 2 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · FL · Ocala

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 391 employers in Ocala, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ozark Service Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crawfordville Operations Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Delivery 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHOCTAWHATCHEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HICKORY GROVE 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Aquatic Plant Nursery LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRV Plant Riviera 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope Power Company 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ocala 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Ocala Hospital 2,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Ocala 1,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocala Regional Medical Center 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR TH Plastics - Findlay Ohio 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Milsco - Thomson 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Christy Webber & Company 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plasan North America 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melway Paving 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Par-Kut International, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE BR Welding Supply LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.