Community meals, social services · California

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner

San Jose, CA · ~105 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Community meals, social services workplace, earning a grade C.

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner: 3.4 TCR = 91% of Community meals, social services BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner safety composite

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2022→2024

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner injury rate improved

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner's TCR fell 0.9 from 4.3 in 2022 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 91% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #3/19
  • PHOTO Metropolitan Ministr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metropolitan Ministries Inc - Tampa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner averages 3.4 TCR (91% of the Community meals, social services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner TCR series: 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner falls in its industry

147 Community meals, social servic establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 19 Community meals, social servic employers in California.

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner (105 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner (105 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Second Harvest of Silicon Valley - Curtner has more employees than the Community meals, social services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2023 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · CA · San Jose

147 Community meals, social services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Ministries Inc - Tampa 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meals on Wheels Central Texas Main Office 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Feeding America Southwest Virginia Salem Branch 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Riverside 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zion Harvest 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing Farm Management 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE SATICOY BASE - 15 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Cronin Auto Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AMG Resources - Elizabeth, PA 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arclin Surfaces 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE StarPet, Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocket Logistics Inc. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claystone Construction Inc 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Machine Holdings - Sheldon Rd 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.