Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing · Connecticut

Senior Aerospace Connecticut

Enfield, CT · ~87 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Senior Aerospace Connecticut runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Senior Aerospace Connecticut: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Senior Aerospace Connecticut safety composite

Senior Aerospace Connecticut scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2018

Senior Aerospace Connecticut injury rate improved

Senior Aerospace Connecticut's TCR fell 2.5 from 3.5 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Enfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Garrett Metal Detect…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garrett Metal Detectors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Senior Aerospace Connecticut in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Senior Aerospace Connecticut averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Senior Aerospace Connecticut TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Senior Aerospace Connecticut falls in its industry

388 Acceleration indicators and sy establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Acceleration indicators and sy employers in Connecticut.

Senior Aerospace Connecticut (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Senior Aerospace Connecticut
Senior Aerospace Connecticut (87 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Senior Aerospace Connecticut has fewer employees than the Acceleration indicators and systems comp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.5 2.2 4 0 0
2016 3.5 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · CT · Enfield

388 Acceleration indicators and systems components, aerospace type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 106 employers in Enfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garrett Metal Detectors 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Warner Robins Campus (1400) 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparton DeLeon Springs 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kustom Signals, Inc. - Chanute 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Region 206 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kanthal Bethel 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE CoorsTek, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Branford 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 41 - Hartford 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 41 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12131 346 FTE
NAT-TCR Lunseth Plumbing & Heating 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Biron Mill 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Armour 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Swedish Institute 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BSL Woburn Development LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Packers Chemical Holdings, LLC (doing buisiness as Packers Chemical) 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victoria Fine Foods 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tomra NY Recycling- Farmington 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.