Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di · Pennsylvania

Senior Life Washington, Inc.

Washington, PA · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Senior Life Washington, Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di workplace, earning a grade B.

Senior Life Washington, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 68% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Senior Life Washington, Inc. safety composite

Senior Life Washington, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Senior Life Washington, Inc.: 1.7 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.98× in 2021

Senior Life Washington, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.4 from 1.7 in 2019 to 5.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Washington, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #32/145
  • PHOTO Allegheny
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allegheny (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Senior Life Washington, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Senior Life Washington, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (68% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Senior Life Washington, Inc. TCR series: 2019=1.7 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Senior Life Washington, Inc. falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 145 Activity centers for disabled employers in Pennsylvania.

Senior Life Washington, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Senior Life Washington, Inc.
Senior Life Washington, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Senior Life Washington, Inc. has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · PA · Washington

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 139 employers in Washington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allegheny 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tazewell County Resource Centers, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Behavoral Health Division 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark-CNJ 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Washington Hospital 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Meadows Racetrack and Casino 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino at The Meadows 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Songer Services Incorporated 621 FTE
NAT-TCR The Glenmore Distillery 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Welk Golf Course 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Simpson Performance Products 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ACRT Pacific 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Coffee - Port Allen Plant 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSA FSS CalWorks South Region 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Lancaster 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nova Infusion 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.