Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Oregon

Shelter One, Inc

Grants Pass, OR · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shelter One, Inc runs at 362% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Shelter One, Inc: 11.9 TCR = 362% of Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shelter One, Inc safety composite

Shelter One, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.2

2017→2024

Shelter One, Inc injury rate improved

Shelter One, Inc's TCR fell 16.2 from 20.9 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.9 · 2018=19.9 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332311 · Grants Pass, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 362% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO A & A Sheet Metal Pr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A & A Sheet Metal Products, Inc (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Shelter One, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shelter One, Inc averages 11.9 TCR (362% of the Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shelter One, Inc TCR series: 2017=20.9 · 2018=19.9 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Shelter One, Inc falls in its industry

393 Utility buildings, prefabricat establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Utility buildings, prefabricat employers in Oregon.

Shelter One, Inc (22 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Shelter One, Inc
Shelter One, Inc (22 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Shelter One, Inc has fewer employees than the Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 15.3 15.3 3 0 0
2022 10.3 10.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 19.3 19.3 4 0 0
2018 19.9 6.7 3 0 0
2017 20.9 20.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332311 · OR · Grants Pass

393 Utility buildings, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 130 employers in Grants Pass, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A & A Sheet Metal Products, Inc 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCC Tifton 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Restroom Company Minden 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Floating Docks Mfg Co 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hammelmans Floral, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Means Nursery Inc (River Road) 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE HASTINGS BULB GROWERS, INC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ekstrom & Schmidt Nursery, LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rever Grand 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colvin Oil I, LLC DBA GP Energy 744 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grants Pass, OR 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1834 423 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinross Correctional Facility 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Avondale,AZ 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sands Wall Systems, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 448-West Sacramento 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saver Group,Inc dba Olive Hill Save-A-Lot 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saver Group,Inc dba Lancaster Save-A-Lot 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thorne Ready Mix Plant 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown Transportation 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.