Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) · California

Sheraton Gateway LAX

Los Angeles, CA · ~326 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheraton Gateway LAX runs at 611% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) workplace, earning a grade F.

Sheraton Gateway LAX: 18.3 TCR = 611% of Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheraton Gateway LAX safety composite

Sheraton Gateway LAX scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.8

2021→2023

Sheraton Gateway LAX injury rate improved

Sheraton Gateway LAX's TCR fell 11.8 from 24.2 in 2021 to 12.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=24.2 · 2023=12.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 611% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #1172/1298
  • PHOTO Hilton Garden Inn Ch…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~326 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hilton Garden Inn Chicago (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sheraton Gateway LAX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheraton Gateway LAX averages 18.3 TCR (611% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheraton Gateway LAX TCR series: 2021=24.2 · 2023=12.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Sheraton Gateway LAX falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1172 safest of 1298 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in California.

Sheraton Gateway LAX (326 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheraton Gateway LAX
Sheraton Gateway LAX (326 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Sheraton Gateway LAX has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.4 5.5 24 1 0
2021 24.2 9.3 39 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Los Angeles

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Chicago 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimpton Key West 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1085 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrow Point - Resort - Harrison 18.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Norman's Nursery, Inc. 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Blooms Nursery, LLC 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE TORRANCE 326 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shire: Westlake Village 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Monterey Court Memory Care 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Carriage House Senior Living 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Precison Delivery LLC. 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FiberTel LLC 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing - Bakery 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockwell Collins (Decorah IA) 326 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Andrews Country Club 326 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.