General warehousing and storage · California

Shipping

Daly City, CA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Shipping runs at 452% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.2
avg TCR · per 100 workers
5.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
12
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Shipping's OSHA Total Case Rate of 26.2 to the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark of 5.8 (452% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Shipping's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.

051015202530 20172018 26.25.8 Industry benchmarkShipping TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493110.

Where Shipping falls in its industry

10,728 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1256 safest of 1258 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Trend analysis for Shipping

Between 2017 and 2018, Shipping's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 26.2 to 26.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 26.2, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 26.2, a spread of 0.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Shipping recorded 12 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 12 injuries shown on this page for Shipping are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493110 - General warehousing and storage.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

6 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 45,794 hours worked = 26.20 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Shipping (this establishment) 26.20 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Warehousing and storage, general merchandise industry avg 5.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 493110
California state avg (all industries) 5.64 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Shipping to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 26.2 26.2 6 0 0
2017 26.2 26.2 6 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Shipping's reported OSHA injury record versus its General warehousing and storage peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 452% of the General warehousing and storage benchmark, Shipping reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider General warehousing and storage sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Shipping's safety grade?
Shipping has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 26.2 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 5.8 for General warehousing and storage.
How many injuries has Shipping reported?
Shipping has reported 12 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Daly City - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.