Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Shoemakersville plant

Shoemakersville, PA · ~115 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Shoemakersville plant runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Shoemakersville plant: 4.6 TCR = 140% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Shoemakersville plant safety composite

Shoemakersville plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Shoemakersville plant: 6.2 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.11× in 2024

Shoemakersville plant's TCR rose 1.7 from 6.2 in 2016 to 7.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Shoemakersville, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #17/36
  • PHOTO Caledonia plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caledonia plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Shoemakersville plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Shoemakersville plant averages 4.6 TCR (140% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Shoemakersville plant TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Shoemakersville plant falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 36 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Pennsylvania.

Shoemakersville plant (115 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Shoemakersville plant
Shoemakersville plant (115 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Shoemakersville plant has more employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 0.5 14 1 0
2023 4.9 2.7 9 0 0
2022 4.1 0.0 7 0 0
2021 4.8 2.4 8 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 6 0 0
2019 3.5 2.4 2 1 0
2018 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 2.8 1.8 3 0 0
2016 6.2 3.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · PA · Shoemakersville

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Shoemakersville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caledonia plant 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mohawk Industries :DTL-MFG- USA Dickson TN Quartz 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Refractories, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnesita Refractories 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade's Greenhouses, Inc. - Lititz 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE WNDOB Windsor Office Building 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Hills Service Center 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael F. Ronca & Sons, Inc. 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Distribution Centers LLC-200 Logistics Drive 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Materion - Reading 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Materion - Shoemakersville 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eminent Inc. dba Revolve Clothing (PA) 108 FTE
NAT-TCR Southeastern Electric Cooperative, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JMS Russel Metals Corp - Blytheville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chief Construction 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6700 Haggerty 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lowes Foods #223 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Joist West 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pasadena Catalyst 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.