Support Activities for Air Transportation · North Carolina

Signature Flight Support Greensboro

Greensboro, NC · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Signature Flight Support Greensboro runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade C.

Signature Flight Support Greensboro: 4.0 TCR = 89% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Signature Flight Support Greensboro safety composite

Signature Flight Support Greensboro scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2020

Signature Flight Support Greensboro injury rate improved

Signature Flight Support Greensboro's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.8 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=9.0 · 2020=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/35
  • PHOTO DI - NAWDC Fallon
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DI - NAWDC Fallon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Signature Flight Support Greensboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Signature Flight Support Greensboro averages 4.0 TCR (89% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Signature Flight Support Greensboro TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=9 · 2020=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Signature Flight Support Greensboro falls in its industry

992 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 35 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in North Carolina.

Signature Flight Support Greensboro (95 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Signature Flight Support Greensboro
Signature Flight Support Greensboro (95 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Signature Flight Support Greensboro has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 9.0 6.8 4 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · NC · Greensboro

992 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DI - NAWDC Fallon 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Miami 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Circle S Ranch NC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE MB Haynes Corporation (Office) 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Conduit Systems, Inc 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR American Box and Tape company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ram Tool Construction Supply Company - Savannah 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ME004 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ground Effects San Antonio 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crafco Equipment Plant 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 278 Fort McCoy LRC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heat and Control Lititz 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2697 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.