Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Arizona

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator

Chandler, AZ · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator: 5.5 TCR = 166% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator safety composite

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2021→2024

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator injury rate improved

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator's TCR fell 5.3 from 6.6 in 2021 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.6 · 2022=8.5 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Chandler, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO Preferred Packaging …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Preferred Packaging Solutions, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator averages 5.5 TCR (166% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator TCR series: 2021=6.6 · 2022=8.5 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Arizona.

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator (51 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator
Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator (51 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Corrugator has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 8.5 5.7 3 0 0
2021 6.6 4.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AZ · Chandler

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Preferred Packaging Solutions, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smurfit Kappa Phoenix Converting 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arrow Carton Company 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Signature Packaging), LLC 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salubrious Wellness Clinic Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mission Citrus 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - AZ (SW) 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSHIA T4-S1 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Magdalena Ecke Family YMCA 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DXY4 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vortec Tooling Solutions, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bergen Logistics--PA1055 Wilkes-Barre, PA 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Radial South River New Jersey 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunshine Home Health 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE OH Cancer Spec Mansfield 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance AC, Electrical. & Plumbing 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.