Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction · Washington

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office

Bothell, WA · ~262 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction workplace, earning a grade C.

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office safety composite

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office held a steady TCR band

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Bothell, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/49
  • PHOTO 15-100 IN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~262 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.8

Where SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office falls in its industry

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelect establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 49 Power plant (except hydroelect employers in Washington.

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office (262 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office
SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office (262 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

SNC-Lavalin Constructors Inc. - Bothell Office has more employees than the Power plant (except hydroelectric) const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WA · Bothell

1,605 Power plant (except hydroelectric) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 101 employers in Bothell, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 15-100 IN 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Core-Mark Spokane 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-AA-SEA-SEATTLE-SEA-TRML 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC Region 072 262 FTE
STATE-SIZE Touchmark at Fairway Village LLC 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips Healthcare 2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips 1,495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips North America LLC 1,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Myers Squibb Cell Therapy Operations 610 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Law Enforcement Detention Center 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Fire Protection 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Settlers (Txose) 262 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gould Ave (Njgou) 262 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.