Electric power generation, tidal · Washington

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building

Everett, WA · ~510 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, tidal workplace, earning a grade F.

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building: 2.7 TCR = 226% of Electric power generation, tidal BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building safety composite

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2023→2024

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building injury rate improved

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.3 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=3.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221118 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Burlington Service C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~510 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Burlington Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building averages 2.7 TCR (226% of the Electric power generation, tidal BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building TCR series: 2023=3.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building falls in its industry

84 Electric power generation, tid establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Electric power generation, tid employers in Washington.

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building (510 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building
Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building (510 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Snohomish County PUD #1 - Electric Building has more employees than the Electric power generation, tidal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.2 8 1 0
2023 3.3 1.9 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221118 · WA · Everett

84 Electric power generation, tidal employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Burlington Service Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NorthEast C/O and DistColl - Bld: 6232 - 01 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHEAST C&O - 1 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kearny - Bld: 5362 - 01 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE WA440 SWEDISH FIRST HILL 1101 MADISON-SEATTLE 510 FTE
STATE-SIZE Behavioral Health Care Outpatient 511 FTE
STATE-SIZE AACRES WA LLC - TACOMA 508 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aacres Tacoma - 10034 512 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Brenk Brothers Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Davco Roofing & Sheet Metal 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cafr-90-Fremont, Ca 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Barraza Code Electric 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Conlan Company 510 FTE
NAT-SIZE 300000170857337 - GA-Atlanta-Operating Center 510 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vavir - Virginia Beach 510 FTE
NAT-SIZE Argus of Colorado Inc 510 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.